Filed under: Uncategorized

Science Corner
by Molly Lambert
Because science (like everything) is so deeply ingrained with sexism dating back well beyond Darwin, there are a million studies about how promiscuity benefits male animals. Now some smart people have realized that females also benefit from being sluts.
In various species, males provide parental care and females mate with multiple males. For example, recent empirical studies show that extra-pair copulation frequently occurs in monogamous birds in which a “social” father provides intensive care for its “social” offspring. Can such pseudo-monogamy benefit through the Darwinian theory of evolution?
Lots of other species have cuckolding females, like starlings.
Look, it’s for the sake of our grandkids, okay? It’s not my fault that female beetles are thirsty for ejaculate.

Beetle sex. Dirty, huh?
Antelopes are one species where the females pursue the males.
Indeed, they have now shown that aggressive female topis compete with one another for a limited supply of sperm from the most desirable members of the opposite sex, even attacking their fellow mating pairs. Meanwhile, resistant males grow choosier about their mating partners, deliberately selecting the least mated females and launching counterattacks against aggressive females with whom they’ve already mated.
The bottom-line of the findings, according to Bro-Jørgensen: “We should not regard coyness as the only natural female sex role just as we should not expect that it is always the natural male sex role to mindlessly accept any mating partner,” he said. “Nature favors a broader range of sex roles.”

The idea that only males would engage in “risky” sexual behaviors is outdated. Clearly (JAMIE LYNN) that is not the case. Even for bloodthirsty cannibalistic jumping spiders.
A study recently published in Ethology found that despite the inherent risk of sexual cannibalism, virgin females were attracted to bigger males when losing their virginity before opting for the safer smaller male as a longer term mate choice.
I could not make this shit up.
Large males are more cannibalistic towards smaller females than vice versa. Consequently, virgin females prefer larger males as mates, in spite of the increased risk of cannibalism, but once the females have mated they change tact and prefer smaller males. In contrast, males make the same choice regardless of whether they are virgins or not and prefer larger females as mates overall.
Gobies are more emotionally evolved than many humans males, they realize being a nice dude and a good dad is the way to a female goby’s heart.

“Ice Cream” – Muscles (mp3)
Six Degrees fallacy
Space food is really gross.
Ice quake in Wisconsin.
Science vs. science fiction.
I think I could beat most of these Guinness World Records.
Why do itches itch?
“Finally Made Me Happy” – Macy Gray (mp3)

an actual star cluster
Pigs save people with diabetes?
Video of the world’s largest swimming pool.
Famous men and the size of their dicks.
Thousands of copycat scientific papers.
Beatles song beamed into space.
Molly Lambert is the senior editor of This Recording. She lives in Echo Park.
PREVIOUSLY ON THIS RECORDING
We grabbed hold of you and didn’t let go.
Kevin Garnett is out with an abdominal strain, but you can relive him in this post.
Molly queen of blogz.

more hubble images here
12 Comments so far
Leave a comment
























speaking of sex: http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSEIC16848020080201?feedType=RSS&feedName=oddlyEnoughNews
Comment by barbara February 3, 2008 @ 1:44 am[...] Wes AndersonIn Which The Fourth and Final Part Of Our Year End Countdown Makes Itself Known To YouIn Which Science Wants To Sex You UpIn Which We Can’t Get Over The Glory of This Age This Is Like The Best AgeIn Which If Dreams Don’t [...]
Pingback by In Which We Are All Rupert Pupkin « This Recording February 9, 2008 @ 1:21 pm[...] Promiscuous girl animals, you’re teasin’ me. [...]
Pingback by In Which The Spectacle Is Everywhere « This Recording February 15, 2008 @ 5:40 am[...] And Has A Little Something for Wes AndersonIn Which We Are Most Similar At Our Age To Mike PenberthyIn Which Science Wants To Sex You UpIn Which Cheney Gives Sayid The Stern Lecture He Had To See ComingIn Which The Fourth and Final Part [...]
Pingback by In Which You Can’t Have One Without The Other « This Recording February 18, 2008 @ 3:19 pm[...] Alligator sex is LOL [...]
Pingback by In Which He Saved Latin What Did You Ever Do « This Recording February 22, 2008 @ 10:40 pmdear sir,
would you please send me the picture of nibiru/ planet x and the description? thank you
Ms. Sjafiatoen noer
Comment by ms. sjafiatoen noer May 8, 2008 @ 12:15 amjl. sritanjung IV/ 54 east java
indonesia
[...] Into The Limited View of The Darjeeling Patriarchy And Has A Little Something for Wes AndersonIn Which Science Wants To Sex You UpIn Which This Area Is Incapable of Building Anything InterestingIn Which We Discuss The Pressing [...]
Pingback by In Which We Get Pre-Engaged « This Recording July 21, 2008 @ 3:46 pm[...] Posts In Which Science Wants To Sex You UpIn Which Jess Ventures Into The Limited View of The Darjeeling Patriarchy And Has A Little Something [...]
Pingback by In Which Sex Is Like Money In That Only Too Much Is Enough « This Recording August 16, 2008 @ 9:23 pmme gusto mucho las ranas felisidades
Comment by manula August 29, 2008 @ 11:27 am..as Doug Stanhope says, the reason we have terms like ‘slut’, ‘whore’, ‘skank’ and the like, is so that women feel ashamed enough not to ‘give it away’ so easily.. Were these terms not to exist (and the resulting psychology surrounding them), nothing would ever get done, ’cause we’d all be too busy fucking each other!
Comment by El Daverino February 16, 2009 @ 9:19 pmsweeeeeeeeeeeeeet
Comment by Anonymous February 19, 2009 @ 10:38 amit amazing 2 know dat dis wuz discvered soooooooo long ago
Comment by Anonymous February 19, 2009 @ 10:38 am